Skip to content
Edgius — home

Knowledge

Every figure on this site traces to a primary source. This is the library those sources live in.

The library

The sources behind the elephants

We cite the way we work: measured, primary-sourced, attributed. Each entry below names the source, what it evidences on this site, and opens in a new window.

[1] World Economic Forum — Future of Jobs Report 2025

The 63%: employers naming skills gaps the biggest barrier to transformation. Also the top-ten skills for 2030.

[3] McKinsey Global Institute — Agents, robots, and us (2025)

57% of U.S. work hours technically automatable with today’s technologies — the Robot elephant’s number.

[4] Asana — Anatomy of Work Index

209 hours a year per knowledge worker on duplicated work — the Duplicate elephant’s number.

[5] Oracle & Seth Stephens-Davidowitz — The Decision Dilemma (2023)

78% of leaders say decisions come first and data is found to justify them — the Bias elephant’s number. n=14,250, 17 countries.

[6] RAND Corporation — The Root Causes of Failure for AI Projects (2024)

The #1 root cause of AI project failure: misunderstanding the problem to be solved — the Mirage elephant’s evidence.

[7] IBM Institute for Business Value (2025)

More than one organization in four estimates losing $5M+ a year to poor data quality — the Fuzzy elephant’s number.

[8] Atlassian — State of Teams 2025

25% of teams’ time goes to just searching for answers — the Silo elephant’s number. n=12,000.

[withdrawn] Panopto — Workplace Knowledge & Productivity Report (2018)

Withdrawn 2026-08-23: “42% of a role’s knowledge is held by one person only”, the Guru elephant’s former number. Its only support was a 2018 vendor survey with no quotable sentence carrying the figure, and a search for a stronger measurement refused every candidate — the closest was peer-reviewed but measured software projects, not roles. The elephant stands; the statistic does not.

[10] Microsoft & LinkedIn — Work Trend Index 2024

78% of AI users bring their own AI to work, outside any governance — the Shadow elephant’s number. n=31,000.

[11] Lee et al. (Microsoft & Carnegie Mellon) — The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking, CHI 2025

Across 936 real GenAI tasks: more trust in the AI, less critical thinking reported — the Zombie elephant’s evidence.

[2] One more, unlinked on purpose

S&P Global Market Intelligence, 2025 — the 42%/17% AI-abandonment trajectory and the 46% of proofs-of-concept scrapped before production. The primary report could not be retrieved (spglobal.com blocks automated access); we cite it through CIO Dive, a named secondary, carrying a one-hop rate-down.

Published

Articles

Ten elephants, ten stories — each built on the evidence above. They are published: every article names the source behind its figures and links back to this library. The Safari is still the fastest way to find out which ones live with you.

Which elephants live with you?