Knowledge
Every figure on this site traces to a primary source. This is the library those sources live in.
The library
The sources behind the elephants
We cite the way we work: measured, primary-sourced, attributed. Each entry below names the source, what it evidences on this site, and opens in a new window.
[1] World Economic Forum — Future of Jobs Report 2025
The 63%: employers naming skills gaps the biggest barrier to transformation. Also the top-ten skills for 2030.
[3] McKinsey Global Institute — Agents, robots, and us (2025)
57% of U.S. work hours technically automatable with today’s technologies — the Robot elephant’s number.
[4] Asana — Anatomy of Work Index
209 hours a year per knowledge worker on duplicated work — the Duplicate elephant’s number.
[5] Oracle & Seth Stephens-Davidowitz — The Decision Dilemma (2023)
78% of leaders say decisions come first and data is found to justify them — the Bias elephant’s number. n=14,250, 17 countries.
[6] RAND Corporation — The Root Causes of Failure for AI Projects (2024)
The #1 root cause of AI project failure: misunderstanding the problem to be solved — the Mirage elephant’s evidence.
[7] IBM Institute for Business Value (2025)
More than one organization in four estimates losing $5M+ a year to poor data quality — the Fuzzy elephant’s number.
[8] Atlassian — State of Teams 2025
25% of teams’ time goes to just searching for answers — the Silo elephant’s number. n=12,000.
[withdrawn] Panopto — Workplace Knowledge & Productivity Report (2018)
Withdrawn 2026-08-23: “42% of a role’s knowledge is held by one person only”, the Guru elephant’s former number. Its only support was a 2018 vendor survey with no quotable sentence carrying the figure, and a search for a stronger measurement refused every candidate — the closest was peer-reviewed but measured software projects, not roles. The elephant stands; the statistic does not.
[10] Microsoft & LinkedIn — Work Trend Index 2024
78% of AI users bring their own AI to work, outside any governance — the Shadow elephant’s number. n=31,000.
[11] Lee et al. (Microsoft & Carnegie Mellon) — The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking, CHI 2025
Across 936 real GenAI tasks: more trust in the AI, less critical thinking reported — the Zombie elephant’s evidence.
[2] One more, unlinked on purpose
S&P Global Market Intelligence, 2025 — the 42%/17% AI-abandonment trajectory and the 46% of proofs-of-concept scrapped before production. The primary report could not be retrieved (spglobal.com blocks automated access); we cite it through CIO Dive, a named secondary, carrying a one-hop rate-down.
Published
Articles
Ten elephants, ten stories — each built on the evidence above. They are published: every article names the source behind its figures and links back to this library. The Safari is still the fastest way to find out which ones live with you.